Categories
Ethics

This professor is very strict about forming a proper exegesis for each theorists view, proper citations, including references, grammar and flow.

Instructions are attach along with the reading materials provided in class. This Professor is very strict about forming a proper exegesis for each theorists view, proper citations, including references, grammar and flow. Please be thorough. Thank you!

Categories
Ethics

Instructions are detailed on how this assignment should be completed.

PLEASE READ THROUGH THE ATTACHED RUBRIC CAREFULLY FOR PROMPT, PLEASE READ THROUGH THE RUBRIC CRITERIA. INSTRUCTIONS ARE DETAILED ON HOW THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE COMPLETED.
FOR SPEAKER’S NOTES, PLEASE GIVE DETAILED EXPLANATION BEHIND EACH SLIDE (10 SLIDES IN TOTAL). PLEASE COMPLETE THIS WITHIN THE NUMBERS OF PAGES REQUESTED.

Categories
Ethics

Apa format.

APA format. ONE SOURCE ONLY. The online textbook will be attached along with instructions for Chapter 3. Main sections for assignment from book are the sections that says “READ”

Categories
Ethics

As a christian leader why is it essential to make decisions using strong analytical data?at least 4 high quality peer-reviewed sources.

Faith Integration Paper: Analytical Data in Decision-MakingFaith Integration Paper: Analytical Data in Decision-Making –
As a Christian leader why is it essential to make decisions using strong analytical data?at least 4 high quality peer-reviewed sources. The Ahmed (2019), and Bartlett (2013) course textbooks are required sources.
include abstract

Categories
Ethics

“call it anything you like.

-Here, you have two questions combined, needing answered in an essay format. Use Times New Roman 12-point font with Top, Bottom, Left and Right side page margins at 1 inch.
– I have included information about Author Mack Lipkin (useful for first question of the essay) and how Paternalism relates to the second question of the essay.
-Do not quote any words. Use your own.
1. Some medical clinics participate in the testing of drugs that are still in the experimental stage. In such situations the Food and Drug Administration stipulates that the physician must explain to the patient the nature of the drug, its possible benefits, and the element of risk in using it. In certain situations, however, physicians may decide not to provide those explanations. The number of their patients may be so large that they feel they cannot spare the time to do so, or their patients may be generally uneducated and therefore likely to be confused by details. Explain whether Lipkin would think either of these reasons justify a physician’s withholding explanation and why or why not. Can you think of any other reason that would justify withholding explanation? Why or why not?
2. “I really don’t understand you,” Dr. Lowell said. “You definitely have cancer of the bladder. We may be able to remove it all surgically, but even if we can’t, chemotherapy or radiation treatments have a good chance of success.”
“I want none of those,” Mark Jenkins said. “I believe that a high-fiber diet and pure, unfiltered water are more likely to help me. I don’t want to be cut or poisoned or burned.”
“You’re crazy,” Dr. Lowell said. “That won’t do anything.”
“I intend to try it. Even if I’m wrong, it’s my life.”
“I won’t let you,” said Dr. Lowell. “Anybody who thinks the way you do about cancer is out of touch with reality. That’s one of the marks of mental illness. And I intend to have you declared mentally incompetent to make decisions about your own welfare. I shall speak to the psychiatrists on our staff and ask the hospital lawyer to arrange for a sanity hearing.”
“That’s fascism!”
“Call it anything you like. But my duty as a physician is to give you the best medical care possible. If that means having you declared mentally incompetent, then so be it.” Dr. Lowell picked up the phone.
Is Dr. Lowell being paternalistic? Explain whether Dworkin and Goldman would think Dr. Lowell is being paternalistic or not and why (and be sure to define paternalism.)
Then tell me your own opinion–Dr. Lowell claims that it is her duty as a physician to provide Mr. Jenkins with the best medical care possible. If this is so, is it her only duty as a physician? Is there some other duty that conflicts with this one? Suppose that Dr. Lowell is successful in getting Mr. Jenkins declared mentally incompetent. Is her action any more or less justified if Mr. Jenkins then fully recovers from his cancer? What if Mr. Jenkins doesn’t recover?

Categories
Ethics

Write and submit an outline of your final research paper.

Write and submit an outline of your final research paper.
Submission Instructions:
The paper outline is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
The outline is to be at least one (1) page in length and must include at least the following elements: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Thesis Statement, Body (points and subpoints), Conclusions, and References.
Consult the Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University for guidance on how to write the outline.
Post your Outline for your instructor’s approval. You must receive instructor’s approval of your Outline before you submit your Final Research Paper.
Complete and submit the assignment by 11:00 p.m. ET on Sunday.
Attached is my topic

Categories
Ethics

Draw conclusions.

Paper – Find two peer reviewed articles in library about ethics in your discipline or ethics in research and discuss the positions of the authors.
Assignment Instructions
Instructions: Select two appropriate articles for review to complete the assignment. Write a review using the instructions below. This paper should be a minimum of 1000 words. Write in APA format. Include cover page, body with in text citations & reference list.
Select two Articles
Locate two peer-reviewed article (related to the ethics) published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal from the online library, then present an assessment comprising of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then, evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article for truth.
Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning.
What are both author’s saying the same topic? Do they agree or is there conflicting information.
Draw conclusions.
This assignment has many benefits. First, it requires a search of indexing and abstracting databases from the online library to find an article that meets the specified criteria (must be related to ethics). It also emphasizes what a scholarly article is; to discern between scholarly and non-scholarly writing; to condense someone else’s lengthy argument into a concise report; to think critically about what has been read by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the research; and, thus, to become participants in the discussions regarding the topic at hand.
FYI: Wikipedia is not an acceptable resource for academic writing. Please use the university library for reference. Articles must be peer-reviewed.

Categories
Ethics

What do you see are the major themes that emerge from the videos by kundu, fox, and robocalyse.

Prepare a 250 word reflection on ethical issues and technology. What do you see are the major themes that emerge from the videos by Kundu, Fox, and Robocalyse.
View themes and issues through the lenses of prescriiptive and psychological approaches to ethical decision making Examine the parallels in the issues raised so far in our course and by the speakers in the videos.
Did any of the content go against any of your values?

Categories
Ethics

Your response should reflect a clear understanding of the material from the chapter (managing social influences on ethical decision making) and lecture notes, not just your personal thoughts about the disaster

Read: https://ivypanda.com/essays/space-shuttle-challenger-disaster-and-ethical-issues/#:~:text=The%20key%20ethical%20issues%20evident,of%20a%20proper%20safety%20culture.
Read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
Instructions: Re-read the descriiption of the Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster (p. 116-118). Then write a 1-page response to the following questions:
• How did social pressures (conformity, obedience to authority, groupthink) influence decision makers at NASA and Thiokol regarding the launch of the Challenger Space Shuttle?
• Consider Boisjoly’s argument for not launching the shuttle. In which stage of Kohlberg’s theory of moral development do you think Boisjoly’s reasoning was grounded?
Your response should reflect a clear understanding of the material from the chapter (Managing Social Influences on Ethical Decision Making) and lecture notes, not just your personal thoughts about the disaster

Categories
Ethics

How does this problem relate to the issue of grounding ethics on religion?

After watching the Video and doing the reading, then lay out what is known as “The Euthyphro Problem”. How does this problem relate to the issue of grounding ethics on religion? Clearly lay out each of the two “prongs” of the problem, saying how each relates to the issue of morality and religion/God. VIDEO AND READING WILL BE ATTACHED.